Skip to content
The Payout Clock
Site sections

Three paragraphs get read at every operator, and no more

Who, how, and what is never claimed

This site is written by one person reading contracts. Three paragraphs in each operator's terms decide almost the whole length of a payout, two of them are usually missing, and saying which are missing is most of what this site does.

The three paragraphs

Almost every operator's terms of service runs to several thousand words, and almost none of it decides how long a payout takes. Three paragraphs do.

The first is the one describing how long the operator may hold a withdrawal before paying it. The second sets a ceiling on how much may leave in a period. The third says when identity documents can be demanded and what happens if they do not arrive.

Read those three at ten operators and the shape of this market becomes visible immediately: the second is published by six of the ten, the third by all ten in some form, and the first by none of them at all. That count is the whole reason this site exists, and it is worked through in the processing window.

What gets copied, and what gets left out

The method is deliberately narrow. Figures are copied with their clause numbers, wording is quoted where the wording is the finding, and nothing is summarised into a rating.

There are no scores on this site, no stars, and no ordering by quality. A comparison built out of documents can support statements like this operator publishes a ceiling of 4,000 EUR a day in clause 12 and cannot support statements like this operator is better. Only the first kind is printed.

The full rules, including what an empty cell is and is not allowed to mean, are in how the clauses are read.

The limit, said plainly

This site has never held an account with any operator listed on it.

No deposit has been made, no withdrawal requested, and no payout timed. There is no stopwatch anywhere on the domain and there never will be, so nothing here reports how long anything took in practice, how support behaved, or whether a particular payout was honoured.

Stating that is not modesty and it is not a disclaimer bolted on at the end. It is the reason the pages are worth reading: a clause can be opened by any reader and checked against what this site says about it, and an account of somebody's withdrawal cannot be checked by anyone. A site that mixes the two owes its reader a way to tell them apart, and the simplest way is not to mix them.

What is paid for

Vave is the paid placement on this site. Its link is advertising, marked as such at every point it appears, and it opens the operator's own site.

It buys position. It does not buy a softened clause, a filled-in cell or an exemption from anything: the row is assembled from the same library, on the same rules, as the other nine, and where the documents publish nothing the row prints nothing.

No other operator named here pays anything, and none was contacted before being included. The reasoning behind that arrangement, and how counts on the site treat the paid row, is set out in the closing section of how the clauses are read.

What the site will not print

Some of these decisions are worth naming because their absence is otherwise invisible.

There are no payout times, because none is published. There is no advice on getting around any operator's country restrictions, in either direction. There is no countdown, no claim that a limited number of people are viewing anything, and no invented scarcity. There is no strategy advice and no suggestion that any game is a good bet, because the site has nothing to say about play at all.

And there is no promise about a licence beyond what a register entry establishes, which is a company name and a permission rather than any guarantee about a cashier: see licence numbers.

If something here is wrong

A site built on copying has one failure mode that matters, which is copying incorrectly.

Every figure carries its clause number precisely so that a reader who thinks a figure is wrong can open the document and see. Terms change without notice, clause numbers move when documents are reorganised, and an operator can publish something new the week after a page was written.

Where a figure here disagrees with the operator's current document, the operator's document is right and this page is out of date. The sequence a payout actually follows, which does not change when a clause number does, is in how long a payout takes, and the reasons a payout can stall despite everything on the page being correct are in why a payout stalls.

Gambling, and when to stop

One thing on this site is not about documents.

Nothing here is an encouragement to play, and none of it is written for someone trying to win back a loss. Every operator on this page is offshore, the money moves quickly in the direction that leaves an account, and reading a ceiling carefully is no protection against playing more than was intended.

Free, confidential help is available from GamCare, linked in the footer of every page on this site.

Questions people actually type

Who writes this site?
Rhys Calder, working alone, reading operator terms and licence register entries. There is no team page here because there is no team, and no reviewer profiles because nobody on this site has played at any of these operators. The name is on the byline of every page and on the pages themselves rather than only in a footer.
How is the site paid for?
One operator, Vave, pays for placement. That link is marked as advertising wherever it appears and it buys position and nothing else: the row is filled from the same library on the same rules as every other, and where its documents publish nothing the row says so. No other operator on the site pays anything.
Have you tested these casinos?
No. No account has been opened, no deposit made and no withdrawal requested at any operator listed here. That is the site's central limit and it is stated on every page that could be mistaken for a test report, because the alternative is a claim a reader has no way to check.
Why does the site refuse to rank payout speed?
Because the figure a ranking needs is published by none of the ten operators, and a ranking assembled from marketing copy would be a ranking of copywriters. What the site ranks instead is nothing: it prints what each operator committed to in writing, with the clause number, and leaves the choice to the reader.
Our partnerVave Open Vave